ANECDOTES AND ANTIDOTES: behaviour
Showing posts with label behaviour. Show all posts
Showing posts with label behaviour. Show all posts

Tuesday, 7 January 2014

BEING ANNOYING COULD GET YOU A PRISON SENTENCE. U.K

YES, THATS RIGHT YOU COULD GO TO JAIL FOR BEING A LITTLE NUISANCE.                                                                                                                                            On Wednesday the Antisocial Behaviour, Crime and Policing Bill reaches its report stage (close to the end of the process) in the House of Lords. It is remarkable how little fuss has been made about it, and how little we know of what is about to hit us.
The bill would permit injunctions against anyone of 10 or older who "has engaged or threatens to engage in conduct capable of causing nuisance or annoyance to any person". It would replace asbos with ipnas (injunctions to prevent nuisance and annoyance), which would not only forbid certain forms of behaviour, but also force the recipient to discharge positive obligations. In other words, they can impose a kind of community service order on people who have committed no crime, which could, the law proposes, remain in force for the rest of their lives.                                                                                                                         This also means that if the police "think" your behaviour  "might" cause offence, not that it has caused offence you could be arrested and hauled before the courts and sentenced.  The law at present, the  1998 Crime and Disorder Act, antisocial  behaviour orders (asbos) has meant that thousands of people, mostly young and poor, have been labeled as criminals already but the next step is to be able to remove anyone from public places, protestors,buskers,football fans singing on there way to the trains could be arrested at the polices behance.
The bill also introduces public space protection orders, which can prevent either everybody or particular kinds of people from doing certain things in certain places. It creates new dispersal powers, which can be used by the police to exclude people from an area (there is no size limit), whether or not they have done anything wrong.
While, as a result of a successful legal challenge, asbos can be granted only if a court is satisfied beyond reasonable doubt that antisocial behaviour took place, ipnas can be granted on the balance of probabilities. Breaching them will not be classed as a criminal offence, but can still carry a custodial sentence: without committing a crime, you can be imprisoned for up to two years. Children, who cannot currently be detained for contempt of court, will be subject to an inspiring new range of punishments for breaking an ipna, including three months in a young offenders' centre.                                                                                                   If you are young, poor, mentally ill,homeless,eccentric or by any chance, god-forbid doing any thing remotely enjoyable/annoying in a rather posh neighborhood of town or city center, be aware you could just be on your way to a prison sentence, of course if you are rich you will have nothing to fear.   
                                                                                                                     
Enhanced by Zemanta

Monday, 2 September 2013

IS WATCHING TO MUCH TV BAD FOR YOUR HEALTH?

British Heart Foundation
British Heart Foundation (Photo credit: Wikipedia)

Every hour spent watching television shortens the viewer’s life by 22 minutes, academics warn.                                                              

Anyone who spends six hours a day in front of the box is at risk of dying five years sooner than those who enjoy more active pastimes, it is claimed.
Researchers say that watching too much TV is as dangerous as smoking or being overweight, and that the “ubiquitous sedentary behaviour” should be seen as a “public health problem”                                                 

Well i can mention a few tv programmes i,ve watched lately that after it had finished i thought i was brain dead. No but seriously if we sit our children down in front of the tv all day long does it actualy do them any harm.?                               Researchers say that watching too much TV is as dangerous as smoking or being overweight, and that the “ubiquitous sedentary behaviour” should be seen as a “public health problem”                                      
Maureen Talbot, senior cardiac nurse at the British Heart Foundation, said: “Sedentary behaviour such as vegging in front of the TV is practically a cultural institution these days and it’s good to relax for a while, but this study supports the view that too much of it can be bad for our health.
“Many of us make a conscious decision not to smoke because we know it’s bad for us, and this study suggests that more of us should make the same kind of pledge about lounging around and watching lots of TV.
       Should or could we cut down on the amount of tv we watch? is it bad for you or is it just one of those stories that someone has made a lot of money out of studying., just a small thought, how many people do you think die either sat in an armchair or lay in bed watching tv?  not a nice thing to happen but tv sets are now being made to assess your health when you are watching  your favourite show.   see link below.                                                                                                            http://www.technewsdaily.com/18401-tv-could-monitor-heart-health.html                               
                           
Now its your turn, do you " like" or "dislike this article, please dont forget to let me know if you think i enjoy this topic and check the "reaction" boxes.    Regards, A+A
Enhanced by Zemanta
WebCrawler